he is
Zathers to be his real office required to account for no more gooohn, a fixed quota
than a
of the revenue derived from native trade. On foreign trade. of course this has not been possible since the institution of the Foreign Inspectorate at the port in 1859. Hence the violent opposition of the Hoppe to its Establmt
These are the only points of
dissidence & have been able to discover between & my own. The case in fact his your conclusions in small compass.. The merchants of the Colony desire removal of all interference with the junks whr. pass & repass between the Colony & the mainland. The Chinese Goot, its attention having been first attracted by the immense loss in opiume
The Junk
duties occasioned
Fraore with Honghong, is determined
by
398
to secure the duties due to China
upon the
E
junks
cargoes of these & so long
as the Chinese "Cruisers treep out of the waters
3
The
Colony it wd be in vain _ were it
reasonable or
legally right-
20
The
attempt the protection of Chinese funks as to the action "Chinese "Authorities whether on
The High Seas or along the Chinese Coast. -
that the
owweillance
Z
the authorities
is often unnecessarily inquisitorial vexations unjust I can
more doubt than
than a
and
m
one
acquainted with the dealing of Chinese Collectivate in general, Neither is it possible to doubt that the subjection of the junk trade to native surveillance must restrict the proportions of that trace. I am bound however to say that on perusal of the Harbout Master's Reports last betover at Hongkong,
wad
2
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.